Manuscript Information

Manuscript Information & Preparation

Manuscript Types

Article TypeNotesPage Limit--bInvite Only
Regular ArticlesCan be part of a Special CollectionaNo set size limits.--cNo
LettersRapid publication option for short manuscripts will be handled personally by an Editor; Can be part of a Special Collectiona; must require little or no revisionLimited to 4 typeset pages; tends to be less than 15 double-spaced pages, including refs, counting each fig. and table as 1 page.No
PerspectivesThese papers can be a preview of an emerging field of study, or a review of an existing field, with a focus on recent developments, and thoughts as to where and how the field is expected to advance. They can be interdisciplinary papers to address a topic that falls at the boundary of Earth and planetary materials with other disciplines. Appropriate research matter involves, but is by no means limited, intersections with engineering, physics, environmental science, medicine, microbiology, or astrobiology, to name just a few possibilities.Max 12 pagesNo
Review ArticlesAssemble previously published information and then analyze and reinterpret it in such a way so as to provide new insightsSubmit no more than 20,000 words counting everything; generally less than 30 pages typeset; less than 100 double-spaced pages, counting each fig. and table as 1 page.Yes, query before submitting
Highlights and BreakthroughsSummaries that provide additional perspective on new articles that appear in Am Minlimited to one or two typeset pages (or less); tends to be under 4 manuscript pagesYes
Discussion/ReplyBrief commentaries ("Discussion") on an Article, the author can respond ("Reply"). Only one round of exchange is allowed. Title your Discussion with the original title of the publication in question, and add "--Discussion" to the end. Title your Reply article with the original title and add "--Reply" to the end.Discussion must be submitted with 12 months of the appearance of a paper in the print version of the journal. 2 typeset pages, or 5 double-spaced, 12 pt font manuscript pages. Tables and artwork should be absolutely minimalNo
Book ReviewsView list of the titles available or contact the Book Review editor to suggest a title you wish to review.preferably 1 page typesetYes / contact us to volunteer
MemorialsClick for more infoNo
ErrataErrata should be within a year or so of publication and should be significant -- a true mistake that would propagate in the future. There will not be an errata regarding references or typos.

To begin the process or to discuss, e-mail the managing editor.
No

Manuscript Formats

FeatureDescriptions
File TypeWord .doc(x) or rich text format .rtf preferred*

Express option: PDF (first round submission only, include line numbers#)
Line SpacingDouble spaced throughout
FontTimes New Roman (or similar) 12-point type
Page SizeUS Letter (8.5 by 11 inches)
Page NumbersYes
Line NumbersNot required (added automatically by the peer review system)

* Note: Although LaTex or Tex files can be uploaded to the peer review system, accepted manuscripts must be provided as doc(x) or .rtf files. Likewise, WordPerfect format files are not permitted.

# Express option: want to upload just one file? You can insert tables and figures at the end of the text in a .doc or .rtf file and thus upload just one Article File. But if accepted (or on revision), then each image must be supplied upon request as a proper high-resolution figure file. (A whole PDF could be uploaded as well, but unless you put line numbers on it, it will not have line numbers. Please do try to include line numbers.)

The parts of the manuscript should appear in this order:

    1. Title
    2. Word Count
    3. Authors and affiliations
    4. Abstract and keywords
    5. Body of paper with Implications section (required)
    6. Acknowledgments, if desired
    7. References cited list
    8. List of figure captions
    9. Appendix text (if any), Footnote, Deposit Items (text)
    10. Tables
    11. Figures
    12. Supplemental Files – Generally, they are not included in the paper but are in separate file(s)

 

Titles should be concise, but descriptive and indicate the basic importance of the paper.

Word Count: Above the title to the right or left, please put your word count, e.g. “Word Count: 7899”. If near or over 10,000 words please explain the need in the cover letter.

Author list: To facilitate web discoverability and protect authorship, it is generally recommended that authors spell out first names rather than use initials only– unless for some reason you are known and established in the literature by your initials.

Affiliations: Please give complete addresses, including postal codes. Add a footnote for authors who have moved (to give a Present address).

Abstract guidelines: Should be 250-800 words (max!); concise; capture broad interest; indicate why results are significant; indicate suitability to an international audience; include important numbers/ranges; followed by list of keywords. Cut and paste your full abstract on OSS. More information here.

You want to entice people who skim abstracts to click on your paper. These are the basic components of a good abstract (adjust these to fit your paper):

  1. Motivation/problem statement: Why do we care about the problem? What practical, scientific, theoretical or other gap is your research filling?
  2. Methods/procedure/approach: What did you actually do to get your results?
  3. Results/findings/product: As a result of completing the above procedure, what did you learn?
  4. (1) Conclusion/Implications: What are the larger implications of your findings, especially for the problem/gap identified in 1 above?

General text details:

  • Use American (not British) spelling conventions.
  • Be sure to use proper super- and subscripts, not raised or lowered type.
  • Use boldface and italic fonts appropriately and consistently. In general, variables are italic; vectors are bold. Molar concentrations are plain M (not italic).
  • Close up percent signs with terms, i.e., wt%, mol%, etc.
  • Terms from “Latin” such as “et al.” and “ab initio” are kept in Roman/plain style and not italic. The exception is biological species names.
  • Spell out the units in the text if not accompanied by a unit. Example: several inches vs. 23 cm.
  • A zero should precede the decimal point for values less than one, e.g., 0.25 rather than “.25”. (Decimal points are periods, never commas.)
  • Polytypes (letters) are italic (e.g., 2M1) but site labels are plain, e.g., M1, O(2).
  • Note that “micro”, “pseudo” and “multi” are not words by themselves, combine with words or hyphenate, e.g., microanalysis, pseudo-Voigt.
  • Do not use the word “micron” in text, figures, or tables. Use micrometer or μm.
  • Other abbreviations (plain type); cf. = compare; e.g., = for example; et al. = and others; etc. = and other things; i.e., = that is; p./pp. = page(s); vs. = versus.

Special characters/notations:

  • Use the “Symbol” font for greek letters as much as possible. Note: Greek letters are already “special” and should not be further italicized.
  • Do not use handmade characters such as lowercase, superscript “o” for the degree sign.
  • DO use Equation Editor for display equations that are complicated; this is not necessary for small inline expressions, such as stacked characters or overbars. If X0i is your expression, we will know to stack it. Or you can say {note to typesetting} if you are concerned about notation at any point, for example {note to typesetting, these minus signs are overbars on top of the 1}.
  • Many common notations are familiar to our staff, i.e., fO2 (2 would be subscript to O) and overbars. When we aren’t sure, we leave things as they appear on the submitted manuscript. Feel free to include notes to typesetting to help us out.

Equations:

  • Use Word Equation Editor or MathType to create display equations.
  • If you refer to an equation in the text, use display equations (set off from the text) and number them sequentially, like this “(1)”. Simple equations can be typed by hand rather than using a special tool.
  • Also use display equations when labels (such as mineral names) have to be lined up beneath formulas, with a note to typesetting if necessary.
  • For equations that are not referred to by number, keep them in line with the text as much as possible.

Acknowledgments: The acknowledgments section should be brief but inclusive. Please double check grant numbers and spelling of personal and company names. Do not use titles, such as Dr.

 

Headings
 

Only three orders of headings may be used. Note if subheadings are used, there must be at least two (e.g., two or more 2nd/3rd-order headings under a superior-order heading; a single 2nd/3rd-order heading by itself is not allowed). Descriptions follow and are also examples:

 

Main or first-order headings (centered, bold)

Second-order subheadings (on a line by itself, flush left, bold)

Text follows as normal.

Third-order subheadings (after a paragraph indention, bold, and followed by a bold period). Text follows in plain type.

Implications Section the concluding paragraph(s) of a paper:
 

Authors should follow their “Discussion” section, with a final section titled “Implications”. This section should be forward-looking; it is intended to provide authors with the opportunity to place their results into a broader context. That context should highlight the importance of the work, and emphasize relevance to and beyond the sub-discipline. This section is not to be confused with a “Conclusions” section, which like the abstract only summarizes the paper (such sections will be cut, regardless of how they are titled). The Editors will look to the Implications section to help judge whether a paper should be highlighted, and to judge whether a paper is suitable for the journal. We also advise authors to report Implications within the Abstract.

 

Additional info: Estimated Standard Deviation
 

Precision of measurement may be indicated as 1.781 ± 0.002, if 0.002 represents a subjective estimate of the measurement error. Where sufficient data permit calculation of the estimated standard deviation (e.s.d.), indicate it with parentheses e.g., 1.781(2) and 1.781(11) indicate an e.s.d. of 0.002 and 0.011, respectively. Only significant digits shall be given for the observed value, i.e., e.s.d. values in parentheses should be given as single or double digit integers. American Mineralogist as a policy requests that all measured values have to be accompanied by some indication on the uncertainty. Ideally this should be a properly calculated standard uncertainty. Only in exceptional cases, if scarcity of sample or some other special circumstances prohibit any even subjective estimation of an uncertainty, can this rule be waived.

 

**Submissions are generally processed Monday thru Friday during normal business hours, excluding holidays**

Guide to Tables

Tables to be typeset with the paper need to be a way to convey information efficiently and the information must be integral to immediately understanding the paper. Tables that may deepen understanding and help reproduce your paper should be Online Materials. These materials are just as important as the paper. Preserving them in the original format and making them downloadable will aid other researchers in their work and expand your work. For papers whose funders would like all data to be available to researchers, we recommend a service such as FigShare — we can embed an URL but a DOI would be safer and longer-lasting.

Format: Ideally the format is Microsoft Word or Excel, but we’ll use txt files as well if need be.

CIF (Crystallographic Information Files): Please click here.

  • Table titles should be brief.
  • The column headings have any appropriate units (in parentheses).
  • Any headings within the table that apply to a block of data should be bold and centered.
  • Footnotes end with periods.
  • No vertical or diagonal rules/lines may be used. No shading.
  • Column headings must be upright, not turned sideways.
  • Brackets to delineate groups of data may be used only if necessary; the groups should be clearly marked on the submitted document!
  • Use white space in the body of the table to separate sections.

Guide to Figures

Figure preparation can be viewed as having two stages: (1) Peer Review and (2) Production (after acceptance).

(1) Figure guidelines for Peer Review: In the web-based submission system, figures are uploaded for reviewers and editors. Most of the time they will be viewed solely on screen. Of course, be prepared to supply high-quality figures if accepted.

Where to upload: peer review website, along with your other files*
Acceptable file formats tif, eps, jpg, pdf, doc (see below#)
(PowerPoint) PPT files are not preferred
Labeling Each figure should have the appropriate numerical label, e.g., Figure 1, Fig. 2, Figure 3a… somewhere on it (such as above, below, lower corner, etc.) See below example.
Resolution: web quality OK* for submission/peer review
File names: entered onto the tabbed files screen (for metadata), simply Figure 1, etc.

* Note, when uploading very large files, conversion to PDF might take a while. There is no need to contact our office unless conversion has not completed after 12 hours.

# Word (doc) accepted for peer review; figures only or at end of manuscript.

 

 

(2) Figure guidelines for Production: When your paper is accepted and goes to Production, then we evaluate the artwork submitted to the online system. High-quality figures are needed for production. If problems arise, we will work with authors to get press-quality images. **New requirement: Each figure should have the appropriate numerical label, e.g., Figure 1, Fig. 2, Figure 3a… somewhere on it (such as above, below, lower corner, etc.)**

Where to upload/send files If we have any problems with your submitted files, the Editorial Office will contact you.
Acceptable file formats* tif, eps, jpg, pdf, doc (see below#)
Word(doc) accepted No, not at production for optimal quality.
Resolution (ppi/dpi) see guide below
File names Always put ms tracking number first and last name e.g., 1234SmithFig2.tif

* Fonts MUST be embedded.

Copyright Permissions:

All figures (tables, video, anything) requiring permission ought to have its copyright information acknowledged in the caption of that figure/table (even if the permission granted is pending this step). Use the following format: “Used by permission of Publishing Company, from Rambo and Pinko (20XX), Journal, vol. x, Fig. Y, p. z.”

A copy of the copyright permission letter is due to the Editorial office as soon as your paper is accepted (or as soon the letter is obtained). Failure to send us this letter will delay publication of your article. You will receive an email after acceptance with instructions on how to fill out the required paperwork; but do not delay in obtaining your copyright permissions once your paper is accepted.

Note: You need a letter of permission even if it is a photograph taken by a friend (unless s/he is a coauthor). Also, images from the Web, including Google and Wikipedia, cannot be used.

Resolution 101

General size guidelines: Assume most art will be 1 column in layout, which is approx. 3 inches (19 picas)– 2 column art can go up to 6.5 inches (39 picas). Do not use hairlines (make lines >0.5 pt thick). The smallest character or symbol on a figure should be 8 pt high to ensure readability. Use a sans serif font (like Helvetica) and be consistent. Remember to “embed” all fonts!

Note that there are 3 types of figures: plain line art, photographs, and combination art (a mixture of photographic and line art elements). Tip: Here is an easy way to test your resolution: view your artwork on a computer screen at 400% enlargement, are lines jagged? fuzzy? acceptable?
Ideal resolutions for Raster art (.tif): 1200 ppi/dpi for line art; 300 to 600 ppi/dpi for grayscale (shaded) art; 300 ppi/dpi for grayscale-photographic or color artwork. While PDFs and .eps artwork are vector (meaning they expand/contract and keep their set resolution), they will still have too low a resolution if low-resolution raster images are embedded inside.

  • Color artwork: Should be CMYK (not RGB); if it is not color, make sure it is grayscale, not RGB or CMYK. Color fees are discussed here.
  • TEM artwork needs special care because of the fine detail and repeating patterns that are difficult to capture on paper with ink in printing. Please use high-resolution images. If accepted, the proofs should be a guideline as to what authors will see and you can re-supply at that point if need be.
  • Disclaimer. Neither the printer nor the American Mineralogist is responsible for the quality of the artwork you supply; a poor file is exactly the same as sending us a blurry photograph. The image in the journal will likewise be blurry. The quality of the final outcome is determined by your equipment, image resolution, and your ability to produce a quality file. We try to help authors as much as possible.

Figure captions

Figure captions should be brief and explanatory; they should not duplicate information in the figure. Place extensive descriptive text in the caption, not in the figure. Follow this format:

  • Figure 1. Description text here.

Multiple parts of figures should be indicated by lowercase letters “a” and “b”. In the caption, make (a), (b), etc. in bold, or use (left/right) or (upper/lower). If letter designations are used for the parts, please label the figures with those letters.

Labels and text in the figures must be consistent with the manuscript and follow Am Min style. Please note our abbreviation style; especially wt% for weight percent, T for temperature, and P for pressure.

Fees for Color artwork

Authors are responsible for the cost to print color in the journal. We strive to keep our fees low (see details here). A very limited color fund is available for financial assistance. But first consider other options outlined on our web site. Alternately prepare your figures to run in grayscale. We make no profit on color and charge the author only the average cost to us.

Interactive Figures

Am Min is happy to support those papers with interactive features such as Quicktime movies (.mov) or PDFs with buttons that change an image to a different view or rollover features. Upload the files to our online submission site. Upload a .mov using the “video” file type; upload an interactive PDF as a “figure” file type just as any other PDF. If accepted, we will work carefully and closely together to ensure success online.

Using GIMP to modify or clean up your figures

Gimp is a free, open-source program comparable to Photoshop. You can download the free software from http://www.gimp.org/downloads/

This software will allow you to modify your figures to correct spelling, adjust symbols, or anything you might need to change your figures, scale them to a different size, and save them in one of our acceptable format: tif, eps, jpg, pdf, doc.

Here is a video that gives you a quick tutorial on how it works.

Guidelines for References

Overview: All citations in the text, figures, tables, and other supporting parts of the manuscript must be in the reference list and vice versa. References are a very important part of your paper. Please do your best to make them as complete and as compliant with our style as possible. Our goal is that when a reader sees Zhang et al. (2010b), they will know that in the reference cited list this will be in Z’s for Zhang, then after 2010a — it is very logical, very quick.

Submitting your manuscript with properly formatted references and correct in-text citations will speed up the editorial process. If they are a mess, your manuscript may be sent back for correction, even after acceptance. Likewise if our automated reference-checking program generates a large list of problems, then you will be asked to make corrections.

Quick tips– What helps the Editorial office the most:

  1. Complete information, such as publisher name, location, page numbers as appropriate, etc.
  2. No abbreviations of journal titles, material source, etc.
  3. Alphabetical order (chronological order for three or more authors; first author’s last name, first initial is all that matters for order).
  4. Note: there is no italic/bold in our style.
  5. Do not use references from Wikipedia; these are not permitted.
  6. Watch this quick two minute video on references: Click Here
  7. A paper still being written is called out in text: Smith et al. in preparation.
  8. A paper still in peer review at a journal: Smith et al. in review. (These are discouraged and if used should be explained in cover letter. Be prepared to provide material or further information. The best use of these is when you are pretty confident it will be “in press” when/if revisions are created, as a placeholder so to speak.)
  9. A paper accepted but not scheduled for an issue: Smith et al. 2015 (use year in text and “in press” as the page/volume part in the reference list).

Ordering References

There are 2 basic things to look for when putting references in order:

  1. Last name of first author in the list — first make the list alphabetical
  2. Then where the last name is the same for multiple references, sort chronologically, keeping solo works together, then keeping doubleton works together, then multi-author works together:Here are examples, in the correct format and order:
    • Andreozzi, G.B. (2002)
    • Andreozzi, G.B., and Lucchesi, S. (2002)
    • Andreozzi, G.B., and Princivalle, F. (2002)
    • Andreozzi, G.B., Princivalle, F., Skogby, H., and Della Giusta, A. (2000)
    • Andreozzi, G.B., Lucchesi, S., Skogby, H., and Della Giusta, A. (2001)

     

    Solo works first by same author: All the solo works by same author clump together, chronologically.

    • Smith, J. (2000)
    • Smith, J. (2001)

     

    Doubletons (Duo) authors: All duos with same first author clump together after the solo works and before the multi-authors. Since there are two “Zhang” papers, they go in chronological order in the clump of doubleton’s.

    • Smith, J., and Brown, S. (2010)
    • Smith, J., and Zhang, T. (2010)
    • Smith, J., and Zhang, T. (2011)

     

    Multi-authors are chronological, in their clump: Note that a and b are added to differentiate the two 2001 papers.

    • Andreozzi, G.B., Princivalle, F., Skogby, H., and Della Giusta, A. (2000)
    • Andreozzi, G.B., Lucchesi, S., Skogby, H., and Della Giusta, A. (2001a)
    • Andreozzi, G.B., Lucchesi, S., Princivalle, F., and Della Giusta, A. (2001b)

Formatting

  • All authors in the references must be listed by: last name, followed by initials (with a comma between, i.e., Jones, H.); exception: when citing an article from a volume with editors, the Editors (Eds.) are listed by initials first, i.e., In G. Washington, Ed., Book/Volume title.
  • Journal names are fully spelled out. This is the most common and most tedious mistake to fix. It is most important that the reader be able to find the reference.
  • Book titles follow “Initial Caps” format, e.g., The History of Rocks
  • Journal titles and chapter titles, use “Sentence case,” meaning capitalize the first word, proper nouns, etc., e.g., Eruptions of St. Mary’s volcano through the ages; A study of Pb minerals.
  • No spaces between initials (Jones, D.H.)
  • Suffixes, such as Jr. and III, go after the initials, with a space (Bosworth, M.R. Jr.)
  • Year in parentheses, with no colons, commas, or other punctuation e.g., (1998)
  • No parts of the reference are italicized, boldface, or underlined, unless it is part of a title (rare).
  • Issue numbers are only needed when the pages start at 1 for each issue, which is rare.
  • Note references in languages other than English by adding: “(in Japanese)” as appropriate
  • For articles In press: List the title, authors, journal name, DOI if you have it, and “in press,” cite them as published works.
  • In cases where the same author(s) have references from the same year, differentiate them in the list and citations by adding lowercase letters; e.g., Smith et al. 2000a, 200b; Donner 1965a, 1965b.
  • In cases where sequential references have identical author lists are replaced by 3 m-dashes, e.g., two references by “Smith and Dymek”, the second instance in the list would be replaced by 3 dashes so as to not repeat in the list. If you see this change on your proofs, don’t worry! (And don’t bother marking it…it is our style.)
  • If there are significantly more than 10 authors, then after the 10th author put “and others.”
  • Doppelgangers: if the last name is the same but the authors are not the same individual, sort chronologically to aid the reader: i.e., Smith, J. (2010) comes after Smith, T. (1999).

Citations

  • Solo works: Smith (2010)
  • Duo works: Tennant and Smith (1998)
  • 3+ authors, use “et al.” (Smith et al. 1990)
  • Semi-colon between citations with different authors (Smith et al. 1999; Jones 1929)
  • Commas between citations with the same last name(s) (Conway and Dymek 1980, 1984) or Jones et al. (1988, 1994). Note: The two Jones may have completely different authors, it doesn’t matter because the reader will be able to quickly find them both chronologically.
  • Omit any reference from the list that is not published (including papers in review or preparation). Cite them in the text by last name followed by “personal communication”, “in preparation” or “unpublished manuscript(data,etc.).” Year is optional in this case.

CSL style may help: We have a brand new listing in CitationStyles.org – if you keep your references in a citation database and apply styles depending on where you submit, in theory you should now be able to apply our style. (If you don’t keep a citation database and have no idea what any of this means, don’t worry about it.) Here are some links of possible information and help about CSL:

Note about URLs: We do not recommend using URLs as they often change. It may be crucial that the reader sees what you saw on the date of access (instead of the updated info one or five or fifty years later) (if the link even still works). In the interest of preservation, if an URL is needed, then try using “WebCite” to create an archived version of the website. Cite it like this: (http://www. webcitation.org/6MiPbLEbu, accessed Feb. 10, 2012).

If you must use an URL in a reference, then include: title of site/material, host of site, date accessed the site, and anything else useful. Otherwise consider something such as a footnote or parentheses: (Smith et al. Database of Rocks, Univ. of Earth Database, accessed Aug. 8, 2012). The citing of databases is still a work in progress for best practices but please do give credit to the authors of the data. It has been also recommended that in addition to a link to the data itself, a reference to the article about the data is included.

Examples of Reference Types

Journal articles:

  • Jakobsen, H.J., Nielsen, N.C., and Lindgreen, H. (1995) Sequences of charged sheets in rectorite. American Mineralogist, 80, 247–252.

Journal articles (in press):

  • Jakobsen, H.J., Nielsen, N.C., and Lindgreen, H. (2015) Sequences of charged sheets in rectorite. American Mineralogist, in press.

Thesis/dissertation:

  • Hildreth, E.W. (1977) The magma chamber of the Bishop Tuff: Gradients in temperature, pressure and composition, 328 p. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley

General Books:

  • Smith, J. (1969) The secret life of rebellious rocks, 432 p. Wiley, New York.
  • Born, M., and Huang, J. (1954) The Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices, 420 p. Clarendon, Oxford.

Books in a series or with editors:

  • Smith, J., Ed. (1969) Our Rock Group, 2nd ed., 1002 p. Wiley, New York.
  • Doe, J. (1990) Phase transition in leucite. In E.K.H. Salje, Ed., Phase Transition in Ferroelastic Crystals, p. 330-334. Cambridge University Press, U.K.

Chapter in MSA’s Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry:

  • Finger, L.W., and Hazen, R.M. (2000) Systematics of high-pressure silicate structures. In R.M. Hazen and R.T. Downs, Eds., High-Temperature and High-Pressure Crystal Chemistry, 41, p. 123-156. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Mineralogical Society of America, Chantilly, Virginia.
  • Short form also acceptable: Finger, L.W., and Hazen, R.M. (2000) Systematics of high-pressure silicate structures. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 41, 123-156.

How to cite data or a database:

  • Ralchenko, Y., Kramida, A.E., Reader, J., and NIST ASD Team (2011) NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 4.1.0) (Online). Available: http://physics.nist.gov/asd (accessed February 15, 2012). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland.

Conference proceedings:

  • Smith, J. (1971) The truth of rocks in Florida. In B. Jones and C. Doe, Eds., Proceedings of the third conference on Florida rocks, p. 224-228. Mineralogical Society of Florida, Miami.

Non-English references:

  • Born, M., and Huang, J. (1954) The Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices, 420 p. Clarendon, Oxford (in Japanese).

Secondary reference:

  • Innocenti, M., Lattanzi, P., and Tanelli, G. (1984) Mineralogy and environment of formation of the Cu-Pb-Zn (Ag, Sb, As) mineralizations of the Niccioleta deposit. Rendiconti della Società Italiana di Mineralogia e Petrologia, 39, 657–667 (not seen; extracted from American Mineralogist, 71, 231, 1986).

Translation:

  • Nogarko, L.N. and Gulyayeva, L.A. (1965) Geochemistry of the halogens in alkalic rocks of the Lovozero massif (Kola peninsula). Geochemistry International, 2, 729–740 (translated from Geokhimiya, 8, 1011–1024, 1965).

Quick Guide to Units and Symbols

Length (l)

m = meter(s)

cm = centimeter(s) (1 cm = 10-2 m)

mm = millmeter(s) (1 mm = 10-3 m)

μm = micrometer(s) (1 μm =10-6 m) NOT micron or μ

nm = nanometer(s) (1 nm = 10-9 m)

Å = angstrom(s) (1 Å = 10-10 m)

pm = picometer(s) (1 pm = 10-12 m)

Volume (V)

L = liter(s); mL = milliliter(s)

cm3 = cubic centimeter(s)

Å3 = cubic angstrom(s)

Density (D or ρ)

g/cm3 = gram(s) per cubic centimeter (please do not use Mg/m3)

Concentration (indicate with square brackets [ ] around chemical symbol, e.g., [Cl1-])

% = percent; ‰ = per mill

wt% = weight percent; mol% = mole percent; vol% = volume percent

M = molar concentration (1 M = 1 mol/L)

m = molal concentration (1 m = 1 mol/kg)

ppm = parts per million; ppb = parts per billion

Mass (m)

g = gram(s)

kg = kilogram(s)

mg = milligram(s)

μg = microgram(s)

Time (t)

s = second(s); min = minute(s); h = hour(s)

Note: day(s), week(s), year(s) spelled out

Ma = million years; Ga = billion years (ago or date)

m.y. = million years; b.y. = billion years (duration)

Pressure (P)

Pa = pascal(s)

kPa = kilopascal(s); MPa = megapascal(s)

GPa = gigapascal(s)

bar or bars (no abbreviation)

kbar = kilobar(s)

atm = atmosphere(s) (not recommended)

Temperature (T)

K = Kelvin(s); °C = degrees Celsius

Frequency (f or η)

Hz = hertz; kHz = kilohertz; MHz = megahertz

Energy

J = joule(s); kJ = kilojoule(s) (preferred)

cal = calorie(s); kcal = kilocalorie(s)

Miller indices– note that letter symbols are italicized but numberic values are not, e.g., [hkl] but [100]

hkl = diffraction symbol

(hkl) = face symbol

{hkl} = form symbol

[hkl] = edge or zone symbol

Unit-cell measurements

a, b, c = edge lengths; α, β, γ = angles

a, b, c = vectors– note boldface

Optical measurements:

      • dispersion (r, v),
      • optic axial angle (2V, 2Vx, 2Vz);
      • principal vibration directions (E, O; X, Y, Z);
      • refractive indices (n; nε, nω, nα, nβ, nγ where the n’s are italic and the Greek characters are subscripts)

Standards for Mineral Names, Nomenclature, and Abbreviations

Mineral names and abbreviations: Use a consistent set of mineral abbreviations throughout text, tables, and figures. Abbreviations are recommended for subscripts, superscripts, reactions, assemblages (connected with plus signs), and normative mineral symbols with subscript weight percentages; however, abbreviations should not be used for mineral names that stand alone in the text. Whitney and Evans (2010; Am Min, v. 95 no. 1 p. 185-187) has recently suggested a set of abbreviations that may be used. For another example, see L.N. Warr’s IMA-CNMNC approved mineral symbols (Mineralogical Magazine, 2021, 85, p. 291-320, 10.1180/mgm.2021.43). However, you may choose another consistent set.

Mineral nomenclature: New mineral names and redefinitions of existing names must be approved by the Commission on New Minerals Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC) of the International Mineralogical Association (IMA) (Fleischer 1970) before publication. For this purpose, consult the published reports of the Commission on New Minerals Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC) of the International Mineralogical Association (IMA). The MSA website hosts many of the IMA Reports.

  • A Special Note About Nomenclature: Remember it is the author’s responsibility to make sure the text, tables and other materials consistently follow the nomenclature recommended by the IMA. Reports detailing the CMNNC approved style for nomenclature for minerals and mineral groups are available.

New mineral names: Authors must provide the Editorial Office with evidence of IMA approval of any new mineral names. Whenever naming new minerals, authors must conform to the rules and principles set forth in Nickel and Mandarino (1987) (excerpt, pdf) or Nickel and Grice (1998) (pdf). The paper by the Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names (1982) should be consulted for a suggested outline for new mineral descriptions. The abstract of a new mineral description should completely list the properties of the mineral in a manner consistent with the “New Mineral Names” section of the journal. The paper by Nickel and Grice (1998) (pdf) gives more information on procedures. Additional information is given by Dunn (1977). Naming of regular interstratifications of clay minerals is discussed by Bailey (1982). In general, manuscripts proposing new names for imperfectly or incompletely described minerals cannot be accepted.

Obsolete, discredited, or superfluous mineral names may not be used. A helpful guide is Glossary of Mineral Species (Fleischer and Mandarino 1995). This glossary is taken as the standard for the spelling of mineral names. However, the editors now allow use of element symbols as prefixes to the approved name of a mineral (e.g., Mg-chlorite, K-feldspar). A list of discredited mineral names and examples of acceptable and unacceptable usages of mineral names appear in Nickel and Mandarino (1987) excerpt, pdf and Nickel and Grice (1998) (pdf).

Meteorite nomenclature: New meteorite names must be approved by the Nomenclature Committee of the Meteoritical Society [British Museum (Natural History), London, U.K.]. Other meteorite names must conform to the spelling given in the Catalogue of Meteorites http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/research/projects/metcat/) or in subsequent numbers of the Meteoritical Bulletin (published in Meteoritics).

List of Necessary Items for Experimental Documentation

(Modified from Table 3.2.1 in the book Basalt Volcanism on Terrestrial Planets)

Most or all of the following can be placed into an electronic appendix, but must be made available to reviewers and the AE for review purposes.

      1. Goal of the experiments
      2. Documentation of starting materials—natural or synthetic—preparation procedures (oxide mix or gel, grinding methods, temperature, oxygen fugacity, etc. of preparation)—state (crystalline, glassy, gel)—mineralogy if crystalline—grain size and grain size distribution—composition after preparation and before use
      3. Experimental apparatus
      4. Thermocouple type, calibration and uncertainties
      5. Pressure measurement method, calibration and uncertainties
      6. Methods of temperature and pressure controlled
      7. Oxygen fugacity (controlled or uncontrolled, method of measurement and error)
      8. Method of addition of volatiles and uncertainty
      9. Sample container—material(s)—open or sealed capsule
      10. Pressure-temperature path during the experiments (heating and cooling rates and time at each temperature and pressure)
      11. Quenching method and rate to reach a specified temperature
      12. Special treatment, if any, during opening of the experimental capsule (e.g., freezing of a volatile phase)
      13. Evaluation of attainment of equilibrium for phase equilibrium experiments
      14. Demonstration of reproducibility and/or consistency for kinetic experiments
      15. Phase composition data in Excel or other spreadsheet format; could be made ready for incorporation into the database Library of Experimental Phase Relations (LEPR; http://lepr.ofm-research.org/; Hisrshmann et al. 2008, G3, vol. 9, DOI: 10.1029/2007GC001894).

Top Tips for Associate Editors

To clear your temporary internet files. This link shows how to clear Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Sarari, and Chrome.

      • Tip 1
        The number of reviewers, which is typically set to 2, means that however many invitations to review are sent, when the first two come in the rest are sent politely phrased, “thank you maybe next time” letters. If you set it to 3 then, then the system waits for three, and so on. You can invite however many reviewers you want to or you can invite two and then add as/if needed.To change the number of reviewers to secure from the default of 2 to the number you need, use the pull-down box on the grid of reviewers screen, then press the “update” button. There are actually several places this box is located, and all of them work fine. Here’s a picture:
        It is recommended to have 2 reviewers but sometimes you might need a tie-breaker or other circumstances might arise. It is personal choice whether to invite more reviewers than needed upfront — if we were going out of town we might do that and in other circumstances we might invite two and then wait and see. It may be that if person x declines, person y is a better choice; but if person b declines then person c must be asked. We absolutely respect our associate editors to make the right call in these matters, perhaps even almost paper by paper decisions. As always any question with the system, please write to the editorial office (peer_review@minsocam.org) not the editor.
      • Tip 2
        If a paper ought to have a CIF (Crystallographic information file), but it does not, email us at the Editorial Office to obtain one from the author. We’ll upload it and let you know. The paper can be in regular review in the meantime, but cannot go past AE decision. More CIF-related tips: (1) If there is a CIF, after regular review is complete, let us know and we’ll “Assign Technical Editor”. (We often just do this without a prompt but never hurts.) (2) If there were problems to solve in revision in the CIF, then let us know to “Assign Technical Editor” for the revised paper.
      • Tip 3
        AEs should ensure that every paper they recommend for acceptance is ready for public viewing: the accepted paper will be the preprint and, eventually, the post-print. It will be a public document. Thus, even a paper with glowing reviews should still be sent a revision letter because the authors deserve one final chance to amend the document and the revision letter contains valuable info for the authors.
      • Tip 4
        Never copy a link from one letter to another letter to send to someone else. Every link is specific to a person and a stage in the relational database. (You can copy and paste a nice intro paragraph from one reviewer to another reviewer — but not the links.)
      • Tip 5
        To avoid creating duplicate or wrong entries in the database for reviewers, start by searching. Here’s a picture:

Manuscript Submission Checklist

Click to Download Submission Checklist

Online Manuscript Submission and Peer Review Website

Submit manuscripts to our online submission site (OSS). Note that updating your contact info on this website does not “transfer” to the MSA membership database (contact the MSA Business Office to update your info).

Submissions are uploaded via our online submission site (OSS). Here are a few things authors should know about our system. Note there is a checklist for submitting new manuscripts located on the web here.

Abstract Information (required)

Cut and paste your full abstract into the box provided (not longer than 800 words and shorter is encouraged). Abstracts are intended to be a brief synopsis of the paper.

Cover Letters/rebuttal letters (required)

As befitting a journal with international reach, submitted manuscripts should have high import as well as broad appeal. In cover letters, authors should explain the importance of their research, and why their results would be of interest to an international audience. If potential authors have questions of suitability of a manuscript, please contact one of our principal editors directly.

For a revision upload, a rebuttal letter detailing your responses or explanations to reviewers concerns is required and helpful. Use the rebuttal letter file type when you upload it to OSS.

File conversion. When uploading large files, conversion to PDF might take a while. There is no need to contact our office unless conversion has not completed after 12 hours.

Tracking. As an author, you will be able to log in and monitor the progress of your paper. However once you have approved your submission you cannot delete it or substitute a new table or something. If some rare situation like this arises, contact the Editorial office for help.

E-mails. Authors get an e-mail confirming their submission, and then an e-mail when an AE has agreed to handle the paper. If that e-mail does not have the associate editor/AE name, contact the Editorial office. It is important for authors to be able to contact their AE. Authors can also send email via the web-based system to the Editorial office and the AE.

Revisions, if and when requested, will also be uploaded via the online web-submission system by using the Replace tab and replacing old files with revised ones. Note that all revisions have the original manuscript number followed by an “R”. All the old files will be available for the editors should any reason arise. Do not keep old files on the revision page. If another revision is requested, that upload will be R1 and so on (a rare situation).
 Note there is a checklist for submitting revised manuscripts located on the web here.

Timeframes for Am Min

In general, an editor is assigned and an associate editor invited to handle the paper within a few days of submission. Within about five days, depending on the time of year, an associate editor has been found. Our goal is for associate editors to find reviewers in a couple weeks for overall review time to be about six weeks. However, as everyone knows, it can be challenging finding reviewers. Our goal is between three and four months revision info should be with authors (unless there are complex circumstances or other considerations, of course). The most important factor to having a speedy submission-to-publication experience is for the AUTHOR to handle the revision instructions very promptly. We remind the author at 60 days and again at 120 days and then, unless there are special circumstances, it is considered withdrawn. Resubmissions are encouraged when the time becomes available. In general, once the revision is in, the AE may request further review, another revision, a discussion or make a recommendation to the editor. If accepted, production of the paper tends to take about three months. Our average submission-to-publication time currently is under 10 months; many papers are faster. These timelines should guide you as to when to contact the associate editor or the editorial office for information on your paper, in a gentle fashion and understanding that all the editors are volunteers.

Please go to our online submission site and submit over the web, which has complete instructions and help files.

Contact us with your questions here.

Nonnative English speakers

Authors for whom English is not a native language must have their manuscript reviewed by a colleague who is fluent in English before submitting it to American Mineralogist. Manuscripts that require extensive editing for grammar and spelling will be summarily rejected.

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Submission Site

AmMin submission process  through the acceptance of a “first” publication takes approximately three to four months. Our acceptance to “final” publication is presently an additional 13 months on average.

Author Instructions

These guidelines explain the American Mineralogist publication procedures, standardized units, and style. We have organized the information in helpful sections to make reference easier.