Manuscripts & Submission

Manuscript Preparation & Submission Instructions

Manuscript Types

Regular Articles: No set size limits. (Note that if your manuscript is more than 10,000 words, you should explain/justify that in your cover letter.)

Letters: Rapid publication (~4 months) of short manuscripts of especially high scientific value, with newsworthy quality. Specific reasons for accelerated publication include (1) timeliness, (2) special significance, and (3) to bring attention to something that is of general interest to scientists outside the specific field of study. Cover letters should indicate precisely why a manuscript meets at least two, if not all three, of these requirements. Keep in mind whether a cohesive story can be told in the four-page limit: it may be  better to submit a regular manuscript than an incoherent four-page Letter. A manuscript submitted for consideration as a Letter that is either too long or not appropriate may be, with the author’s approval, converted to a regular Article. To ensure rapid publication, Letter manuscripts will only be considered if little or no revision is necessary after the reviews are complete; if extensive revision is required, the manuscript may be rejected. For this reason, rejection does not imply that the submission is of no worth: papers that would have been given “major revisions” as a scientific Article will usually be rejected as a Letter. However, a revised manuscript can be resubmitted later for (re)consideration as a Letter or Article. Maximum 4 printed pages, not including references. At submission, Letter manuscripts must be no more than 15 pages in length, counting the title page and each figure and table as a separate page.

Perspectives: These papers can be a preview of an emerging field of study or a review of an existing field, with a focus on recent developments and on where and how the field is expected to advance. They can be interdisciplinary papers that address a topic at the boundary of Earth and planetary materials and other disciplines. Appropriate research matter involves, but is by no means limited to, intersections with engineering, physics, environmental science, medicine, microbiology, or astrobiology, to name just a few possibilities. Maximum 12 printed pages.

Review Articles: Am Min publishes stand-alone Review Articles or, with the Special Publication Editor’s permission, several theme-oriented reviews as part of a series. Review Articles should not merely be a reiteration of previously published data but should serve to selectively assemble previously published information and then analyze and reinterpret it in such a way as to provide new insights. Review Articles are subject to the same review procedures as other technical manuscripts, but they may be longer than the typical Article. Contact the Special Publication Editor with your proposal before submitting.

Highlights and Breakthroughs: H&Bs are brief articles that summarize and provide additional perspective on recently accepted articles in Am Min or on other key topics in Earth and Planetary Materials published in other journals. These papers are, under most circumstances, submitted by invitation from one of the Editors or Special Publications Editor (often suggested by reviewer recommendations); however, unsolicited H&B papers will be considered. Maximum 1-2 printed pages.

Discussion/Reply: Brief commentaries (Discussion) on an article published in Am Min, the author is given the opportunity to respond (Reply). Only one round of exchange is allowed. The Discussion title should include the original title of the article being discussed, and add “–Discussion” to the end. Likewise, Reply articles use the original title and add “–Reply” to the end. Discussions must be submitted within 12 months of the appearance of a paper in the print version of the journal. Maximum: 2 typeset pages. Tables and artwork should be kept to an absolute minimum.

Special Collections are a means by which the journal publishes a set of related Articles printed or presented together under a unified theme. These themes may be associated with an emerging field or a related set of important advances in an existing field of study and are typically handled by a Special Collection Associate Editor (AE). The Special Collection AE will solicit papers for the Special Collection, review each submission, and then make formal recommendations to the Principal Editors to accept or reject — all the tasks and responsibilities of a regular AE. Additionally, it is the Special Collection AE’s choice as to whether the section will contain only invited or also unsolicited papers. The themes may be associated with a conference, or not. The papers are published as any papers are, as they are ready, but then they are also “tagged” and “linked” to a special collection page. Click the link for Special Collections Page on the menu above for more information. Please contact the Special Publication Editor to submit an idea for a Special Collection topic. Decisions on a Special Collection will be based on the perceived timeliness and impact.

Other routine publications include: Book Reviews (Contact the Book Review editor to suggest a title to be reviewed or offer to write a review; 1-2 printed pages; Invite only.) Memorials (Typically reserved for Mineralogical Society of America (MSA) members; meant to highlight the individual’s contributions to science and past participation in MSA. Manuscripts should be submitted to the managing editor. If an individual’s complete list of publications is lengthy, select only a few to highlight.)

Errata: An erratum or corrigendum should be submitted within a year or so of publication and should be significant — a true mistake that would propagate in the future. There will not be an erratum regarding references or typos. To begin the process or ask questions, e-mail the managing editor.

Manuscript Format

FeatureDescriptions
File TypeWord .doc(x) preferred, or rich text format .rtf*
Line SpacingDouble spaced throughout
FontTimes New Roman (or similar) 12-point type
Page SizeUS Letter (8.5 by 11 inches)
Page NumbersYes
Line NumbersNot required (added automatically by the peer review system)
* Note: Although LaTex (Tex) files can be uploaded to the peer review system, accepted manuscripts must be provided as doc(x) or .rtf files. Likewise, WordPerfect or Open Office files are not permitted. PDFs are allowed at initial submission but not for revisions.

Manuscript Structure & Headings:

The Am Min headings style changed with volume 111 (2026). Please note the following format:

1st level (A) – bold center

2nd level (B) – bold, flush left

3rd level (C) – bold italic, flush left

4th level (D). – indent, bold, ends with period

5th level (E). – indent, bold italic, ends with period

Note: Headings should be in “Title case” where most words are capitalized, exceptions for “of”, “and”, and similar words.

The parts of the manuscript should appear in this order:

Word CountAt the top of your first page, include the "word count" (including references and figure captions, but not tables). This will help the editors. (Note that if your manuscript is more than 10,000 words you should explain/justify that in your cover letter.)
Titleshould be concise, but descriptive and indicate the basic importance of the paper, location is a good thing to include
Authors and AffiliationsTo facilitate web discoverability and protect authorship, it is generally recommended that authors spell out first names rather than using initials only – unless, for some reason, known in the literature by initials. ORCID links can be included. Give mailing addresses, including postal codes. Use the address where the work was completed (or funding originated). Add a footnote for authors who have since moved (list as “Present address”). See additional note below.
Abstract and Keywords250-800 words (max); concise; capture broad interest; indicate why results are significant to an international audience; include important numbers/ranges; followed by list of keywords. More below.
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
The main headings of your manuscript may vary according to the content and organization. Geological Setting, for example, is featured in many, but not all papers. In general, the experimental or analytical methods section appears in a smaller font size in the final version. Variations in headings are accepted, but follow this general format.
Implications, Concluding Remarkssee below
Data Availability (optional)Am Min deposits have their own endnote; this is for linking to data on the web (e.g., with Zotero or other depository)
Acknowledgments and Fundingkeep it brief but inclusive; verify grant numbers; carefully proofread names; do not use titles, such as Dr./Prof.
References Citedinclude references cited in supplemental materials
Endnotes (if any)Do not use footnotes for the text; use endnotes instead.
Figure Captions
Tables may be separate files if .xls(x); details below
Figuresmay be separate files; details below
Supplemental Deposit Itemsseparate files; we call them Online Materials

Clarifying Affiliations:

When preparing the manuscript, list the institution(s) where the research was conducted as the affiliation(s). This might not be the institution where you are currently working. You may document your present affiliation in a footnote, calling it “Present address,” or in the acknowledgments section. If your present affiliation has granted funds toward this publication, even if the work was conducted elsewhere, you may list it as an affiliation address. Authors can have more than one affiliation address.

If your contact address changes during peer review or production, let us know, and we will update or add the “Present address” footnote in the final paper.

Abstract Guidelines:

These are the basic components of a good abstract (adjust these to fit your purposes):

  1. Motivation/Problem statement: Why care about the problem? What practical, scientific, theoretical, or other gap is your research filling?
  2. Methods/Procedure/Approach: What did you do to get your results?
  3. Results/Findings/Product: As a result of completing the above procedure, what did you learn?
  4. Conclusion/Implications: What are the larger implications of your findings, especially for the problem/gap identified in 1 above?

Implications Section:

The editors encourage authors to include a section on broader implications in the concluding paragraph(s) of a manuscript. Most of the time, it is beneficial for readers to have this section to help place the work into a broader context. If you feel this does not apply to your paper, you may leave it out; however, the editor or AE may request that you provide this paragraph.

Authors may follow their “Discussion” section with a final section titled “Implications”. This section should be forward-looking; it is intended to provide authors with the opportunity to place their results into a broader context, i.e., the Earth, planetary, energy, and/or environmental applications. That context should highlight the importance of the work and emphasize relevance to and beyond the sub-discipline. This section is not to be confused with a “Conclusions” section, which, like the abstract, summarizes the paper. The Editors may look to the Implications section to help judge whether a paper is suitable for the journal. We also advise authors to report Implications within the Abstract.

**Submissions are generally processed Monday through Friday during regular business hours, excluding U.S. holidays**

Guide to Tables

Tables included in the final paper need to convey information efficiently and be integral to understanding the paper. Tables that may deepen understanding and help reproduce your results should be in the Online Materials as a supplement. Online materials are freely available, aiding researchers in their work and expanding on your findings. If the data for your paper is available via an online depository (such as Zotero) — we can include the URL, preferably a DOI.

Format: Ideally, Microsoft Word or Excel.

General notes about Tables:

  • Titles should be brief and descriptive.
  • Column headings should have the appropriate units (in parentheses).
  • Headings within the table should be bold and centered.
  • Footnotes end with periods. Use superscript a,b,c, etc. to refer to footnotes (do not use symbols or numbers).
  • Keep the design and layout as simple as possible. Avoid lines, complicated layouts, and shading.
  • Column headings must be in standard alignment, not rotated.
  • Use an extra return (white space) in the body of the table to separate sections rather than rules/lines.
  • Ensure that blocks of text and their alignment relative to the data are clear. Use “notes to typesetting” for straddle rules and aligning headings over multiple columns, for example. Vertical brackets are difficult to lay out and may be unclear to the reader. When in doubt, we refer to the original submitted files.

CIF (Crystallographic Information Files): CIFs are required for those reporting new structures or refinements of the structures of known minerals.  The CIF must contain all of the structural data for the manuscript. Only one CIF per manuscript (or provide an explanation for more than one). Guidelines for preparation of the CIF are below (or click on CIF in the menu bar). It is required to check your CIF for errors to ensure that it is free of errors, especially syntax errors, prior to submission. (Syntax errors are a large problem, and carefully eliminating those will speed your manuscript along.) Use one of these programs (author’s choice):
– EnCIFer  https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/Community/csd-community/encifer/ or
– publCIF https://journals.iucr.org/services/cif/publcif/

At submission, upload the CIF, CheckCIF report, and structure factors. If applicable to your manuscript, these items are required for the peer review and technical review process.

Guide to Figures

Figure preparation has two stages: (1) Peer Review and (2) Production (after acceptance). Of course, be prepared to supply high-quality figures if accepted.

(1) Figure guidelines for Peer Review: Figures submitted for peer review are intended for reviewers and editors. Most of the time, they will be viewed solely on screen.

When/where to upload: peer review website, at submission*
Acceptable file formats tif, eps, jpg, pdf, doc (see below#)
(PowerPoint) PPT files are not preferred
Labeling IMPORTANT! Each figure should have the appropriate label, e.g., “Figure 1”, etc… somewhere on the image itself (above, below, lower corner, etc.) See the example below.
Resolution: web quality OK* for submission/peer review

* Note: when uploading very large files, conversion to PDF might take a while, depending on your internet speed and connection. There is no need to contact our office unless the conversion has not been completed after 12 hours.

# Word (doc) accepted for peer review; figures alone or at the end of the manuscript.

Sample figure:

Sample figure for a submitted manuscript displaying the "Figure 1" label outside the image area for the reference of reviewers and editors.

(2) Figure guidelines for Production: When your paper is accepted and sent to production, we evaluate the figures at that time. High-quality figures are requested as needed. Follow the same labeling guidelines as above.

Where/where to upload The Editorial Office will contact you with a link to upload.
Acceptable file formats* tif, eps, jpg, pdf
Resolution (ppi/dpi) See below.
File names Always put your manuscript number first and last name, e.g., 1234SmithFig1.tif

* Fonts MUST be embedded.

Copyright Permissions:

All figures (tables, video, data, etc.) that require permission must have the source (copyright holder) acknowledged in the caption. Suggested format: “Used with permission of Publishing Company, from Jones and Smith (2000), Journal, vol. x, Fig. Y, p. z.” You may use a normal citation if the source is in the reference list, which it probably should be. One exception is when using a photograph taken by someone who is not an author on the paper, in which case you must obtain written permission from the copyright holder and note it in the caption. For example: “Photo courtesy of John Smith.”

Am Min requires the corresponding author to send a copy of the copyright permission letter as soon as your paper is accepted (or as soon as the letter is obtained). You will receive an email after acceptance with instructions on how to fill out the required paperwork, but do not delay in obtaining your copyright permissions once your paper is accepted.

Resolution 101

General size guidelines: Assume most art will be 1 column in layout, which is approx. 3 inches (19 picas) — 2 column art can go up to 6.5 inches (39 picas). Do not use hairlines (make lines >0.5 pt thick). The smallest character or symbol on a figure should be 8 pt high to ensure readability. Use a sans serif font (like Helvetica) and be consistent. Remember to “embed” all fonts! If possible, rasterize your figures to avoid problems involving (hidden) layers.

Note that there are 3 types of figures: plain line art, photographs, and combination art (a mixture of photographic and line art elements). Tip: Here is an easy way to test your resolution: view your artwork on a computer screen at 400% enlargement, are lines jagged? fuzzy? acceptable?
Ideal resolutions for Raster art (.tif): 1200 ppi/dpi for line art; 300 to 600 ppi/dpi for grayscale (shaded) art; 300 ppi/dpi for grayscale-photographic or color artwork. While PDFs and .eps artwork are vector (meaning they expand/contract and keep their set resolution), they will still have too low a resolution if low-resolution raster images are embedded inside.

  • Color artwork: Should be CMYK (not RGB); if it is not color, make sure it is grayscale, not RGB or CMYK. Color fees are discussed here.
  • TEM artwork needs special care because of the fine detail and repeating patterns that are difficult to capture on paper with ink in printing. Please use high-resolution images. If accepted, the proofs should be a guideline as to what authors will see and you can re-supply at that point if need be.
  • Disclaimer. Neither the printer nor the American Mineralogist is responsible for the quality of the artwork you supply; a poor file is exactly the same as sending us a blurry photograph. The image in the journal will likewise be blurry. The quality of the final outcome is determined by your equipment, image resolution, and your ability to produce a quality file. We try to help authors as much as possible.

Figure captions

Figure captions should be brief and explanatory; they should not duplicate information in the figure. Place extensive descriptive text in the caption, not in the figure. Follow this format:

Figure 1. Description text here.

Multiple parts of figures should be indicated by lowercase letters “a” and “b”. In the caption, make (a), (b), etc. in bold, or use (left/right) or (upper/lower). If letter designations are used for the parts, please label the figures with those letters.

Labels and text in the figures must be consistent with the manuscript and follow Am Min style. Please check our abbreviation guide, e.g, wt% for weight percent, T for temperature, and P for pressure.

Fees for Color Figures

Authors are responsible for the cost to print color in the journal. We strive to keep our fees low (see details here). Consider joining MSA to obtain free online color figures. You may prepare your figures to print in grayscale or black & white, or we will convert them for you.

Guidelines for References

Overview: All citations in the text, figures, tables, and other supporting parts of the manuscript must be in the reference list and vice versa. References are a very important part of your paper. Please do your best to make them as complete and as compliant with our style as possible. Our goal is that when a reader sees Zhang et al. (2010b), they will know that in the reference cited list, it will be in Z’s for Zhang, listed after 2010a, it is very logical and quick to follow.

Submitting your manuscript with properly formatted references and correct in-text citations will speed up the editorial process. If they are a mess, your manuscript may be sent back for correction, even after acceptance. Likewise, if our automated reference-checking program generates an extensive list of problems, then you will be asked to make corrections.

Quick tips — Here’s what helps the Editorial office the most:

  1. Complete information, such as publisher name, location, page numbers as appropriate, etc.
  2. No abbreviations of journal titles, material source, etc. Spell everything out.
  3. References: Alphabetical order (chronological order for three or more authors by the first author’s last name).
  4. Citations: in text, list them chronologically by year, but group entries with the same name together, e.g., Smith 1978, 1998; Cooper 1980.
  5. Don’t use italic or bold for journal names, years, etc.
  6. Try not to cite from Wikipedia directly.
  7. For a paper still being written, cite it as “in preparation” or “in revision.” For a paper in peer review, cite it as “in review.” (These are discouraged and, if used, should be explained in the cover letter. Hopefully, it will be “in press”  when we publish.)
  8. For a paper that is accepted but not assigned to an issue: use the current (or anticipated) year in text citations and add “in press” in the reference list).

Ordering References

There are two basic things to look for when putting references in order:

  1. Make the list alphabetical using the last name of first author in the list.
  2. Then where the last name is the same for multiple references, sort chronologically (by year), considering first the number of authors. Works by one author are listed before works by two authors, then lists works by 3 or more authors after them. Here are examples, in the correct format and order:
    • Andreozzi, G.B. (2002)
    • Andreozzi, G.B. and Lucchesi, S. (2002)
    • Andreozzi, G.B. and Princivalle, F. (2002)
    • Andreozzi, G.B., Princivalle, F., Skogby, H., and Della Giusta, A. (2000)
    • Andreozzi, G.B., Lucchesi, S., Skogby, H., and Della Giusta, A. (2001)

    Sort the reference list by the last name of the first author/Same last name: Works by one  author with the same last name group together, chronologically.

    • Smith, J. (2000)
    • Smith, A. (2001)

    Followed by works by exactly two authors: Sorted by the first author’s last name, consider the second author’s last name if needed for alphabetical order. Ignore the first name initial and sort by year.

    • Smith, J. and Brown, S. (2010)
    • Smith, J. and Zhang, T. (2010)
    • Smith, J. and Zhang, S. (2011)

    Works by three or more authors are listed chronologically (by year): Note that “a” and “b” are added to differentiate the two  papers with the same year.

    • Andreozzi, G.B., Princivalle, F., Skogby, H., and Della Giusta, A. (2000)
    • Andreozzi, G.B., Lucchesi, S., Skogby, H., and Della Giusta, A. (2001a)
    • Andreozzi, G.B., Lucchesi, S., Princivalle, F., and Della Giusta, A. (2001b)

Formatting for Reference List

  • Author names: last name, followed by initials (with a comma between, e.g., Jones, H.)
  • Journal names are spelled out.
  • Capitalization for titles: for books, capitalize most words. For journal and chapter titles, capitalize the first word and proper nouns
  • No spaces between initials
  • Suffixes, such as Jr. and III, go after the initials, with a space (e.g., Bosworth, M.R. Jr.)
  • No parts of the reference are italicized, boldface, or underlined, unless it is part of a title (rare)
  • Note references in languages other than English by adding: “(in Japanese)” or whatever as appropriate at the end
  • For articles that are “in press”: List the authors, title, anticipated year, journal name, DOI if you have it, and “in press”
  • Use lowercase letters to differentiate sources with the exact same author name(s): e.g., Smith et al. 2000a, 200b; Donner 1965a, 1965b
  • In production, where references have identical author lists, entries after the first are replaced by 3 m-dashes, e.g., two references by “Smith and Dymek”, the second instance in the list would be replaced by 3 dashes so as not to repeat in the list. If you see this change on your proofs, don’t worry! (And don’t bother marking it…it is our style.)
  • If there are more than 10 authors, list them up to the 10th author, then put “and others.”

In-text Citation Style

  • 1 author: Smith (2010)
  • 2 authors: Tennant and Smith (1998)
  • 3+ authors, use “et al.” (Smith et al. 1990)
  • In parentheses, use a semicolon between citations with different authors: (Jones 1929; Smith et al. 1999)
  • List citations with the same last name(s) together, separated by a comma: (Conway and Dymek 1980, 1984) or Jones et al. (1988, 1994). Note: The two “Jones”es may actually be different authors; however, it doesn’t matter because the reader will be able to quickly find them both chronologically.
  • Omit any reference from the list that is not published (including papers in review or preparation). Cite them in the text by last name followed by “personal communication,” “in preparation,” or “unpublished manuscript (data,etc.).” Year is optional in this case.
  • Refer to the citation year and list them in chronological order, e.g, (Jones 1929; Jones et al. 1988, 1994; Smith 2010)

Note about URLs: We do not recommend using URLs as they often change. It may be crucial that the reader sees what you saw on the date of access (instead of the updated info one or five or fifty years later) (if the link even still works).

If you must use a URL in a reference, please include: title, host company or institution, and  the date you accessed the site. Consider listing the URL as an endnote or in parentheses. Citing databases is still a work in progress for best practices, but you should credit the authors of the data. It has been recommended to include a link to the data, and if applicable, a reference to the article that includes the data.

Sample References

Journal articles:

  • Jakobsen, H.J., Nielsen, N.C., and Lindgreen, H. (1995) Sequences of charged sheets in rectorite. American Mineralogist, 80, 247–252, https://doi.org/10.2138/am-1995-3-406.

Journal articles (in press):

  • Jakobsen, H.J., Nielsen, N.C., and Lindgreen, H. (2015) Sequences of charged sheets in rectorite. American Mineralogist, in press.

Thesis/dissertation:

  • Hildreth, E.W. (1977) The magma chamber of the Bishop Tuff: Gradients in temperature, pressure and composition, 328 p. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.

Books:

  • Smith, J. (1969) The Secret Life of Rebellious Rocks, 432 p. Wiley.
  • Born, M. and Huang, J. (1954) The Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices, 420 p. Clarendon, Oxford.

Books in a series or with editors:

  • Smith, J., Ed. (1969) Our Rock Group, 2nd ed., 1002 p. Wiley.
  • Doe, J. (1990) Phase transition in leucite. In E.K.H. Salje, Ed., Phase Transition in Ferroelastic Crystals, p. 330-334. Cambridge University Press.

Chapter in MSA’s Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry:

  • Finger, L.W. and Hazen, R.M. (2000) Systematics of high-pressure silicate structures. In R.M. Hazen and R.T. Downs, Eds., High-Temperature and High-Pressure Crystal Chemistry, 41, p. 123-156. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Mineralogical Society of America, Chantilly, Virginia.
  • Short form also acceptable: Finger, L.W. and Hazen, R.M. (2000) Systematics of high-pressure silicate structures. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 41, 123-156.

How to cite data or a database:

  • Ralchenko, Y., Kramida, A.E., Reader, J., and NIST ASD Team (2011) NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 4.1.0) (Online). Available: http://physics.nist.gov/asd (accessed February 15, 2012). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland.

Conference proceedings:

  • Smith, J. (1971) The truth of rocks in Florida. In B. Jones and C. Doe, Eds., Proceedings of the Third Conference on Florida Rocks, p. 224-228. Mineralogical Society of Florida, Miami.

Non-English references:

  • Born, M. and Huang, J. (1954) The Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices, 420 p. Clarendon, Oxford (in Japanese).

Secondary reference:

  • Innocenti, M., Lattanzi, P., and Tanelli, G. (1984) Mineralogy and environment of formation of the Cu-Pb-Zn (Ag, Sb, As) mineralizations of the Niccioleta deposit. Rendiconti della Società Italiana di Mineralogia e Petrologia, 39, 657–667 (not seen; extracted from American Mineralogist, 71, 231, 1986).

Translation:

  • Nogarko, L.N. and Gulyayeva, L.A. (1965) Geochemistry of the halogens in alkalic rocks of the Lovozero massif (Kola peninsula). Geochemistry International, 2, 729–740 (translated from Geokhimiya, 8, 1011–1024, 1965).

Quick Guide to Units and Symbols

Length (l)

m = meter(s)

cm = centimeter(s) (1 cm = 10-2 m)

mm = millmeter(s) (1 mm = 10-3 m)

μm = micrometer(s) (1 μm =10-6 m) NOT micron or μ

nm = nanometer(s) (1 nm = 10-9 m)

Å = angstrom(s) (1 Å = 10-10 m)

pm = picometer(s) (1 pm = 10-12 m)

Volume (V)

L = liter(s); mL = milliliter(s)

cm3 = cubic centimeter(s)

Å3 = cubic angstrom(s)

Density (D or ρ)

g/cm3 = gram(s) per cubic centimeter (please do not use Mg/m3)

Concentration (indicate with square brackets [ ] around chemical symbol, e.g., [Cl1-])

% = percent; ‰ = per mill

wt% = weight percent; mol% = mole percent; vol% = volume percent

M = molar concentration (1 M = 1 mol/L)

m = molal concentration (1 m = 1 mol/kg)

ppm = parts per million; ppb = parts per billion

Mass (m)

g = gram(s)

kg = kilogram(s)

mg = milligram(s)

μg = microgram(s)

Time (t)

s = second(s); min = minute(s); h = hour(s)

Note: day(s), week(s), year(s) spelled out

Ma = million years; Ga = billion years (ago or date)

m.y. = million years; b.y. = billion years (duration)

Pressure (P)

Pa = pascal(s)

kPa = kilopascal(s); MPa = megapascal(s)

GPa = gigapascal(s)

bar or bars (no abbreviation)

kbar = kilobar(s)

atm = atmosphere(s) (not recommended)

Temperature (T)

K = Kelvin(s); °C = degrees Celsius

Frequency (f or η)

Hz = hertz; kHz = kilohertz; MHz = megahertz

Energy

J = joule(s); kJ = kilojoule(s) (preferred)

cal = calorie(s); kcal = kilocalorie(s)

Miller indices– note that letter symbols are italicized but numberic values are not, e.g., [hkl] but [100]

hkl = diffraction symbol

(hkl) = face symbol

{hkl} = form symbol

[hkl] = edge or zone symbol

Unit-cell measurements

a, b, c = edge lengths; α, β, γ = angles

a, b, c = vectors– note boldface

Optical measurements:

        • dispersion (r, v),
        • optic axial angle (2V, 2Vx, 2Vz);
        • principal vibration directions (E, O; X, Y, Z);
        • refractive indices (n; nε, nω, nα, nβ, nγ where the n’s are italic and the Greek characters are subscripts)

Standards for Mineral Names, Nomenclature, and Abbreviations

Mineral names and abbreviations: Use a consistent set of mineral abbreviations throughout text, tables, and figures. Abbreviations are recommended for subscripts, superscripts, reactions, assemblages (connected with plus signs), and normative mineral symbols with subscript weight percentages; however, abbreviations should not be used for mineral names that stand alone in the text. Whitney and Evans (2010; Am Min, v. 95 no. 1 p. 185-187) has recently suggested a set of abbreviations that may be used. For another example, see L.N. Warr’s IMA-CNMNC approved mineral symbols (Mineralogical Magazine, 2021, 85, p. 291-320, 10.1180/mgm.2021.43). However, you may choose another consistent set.

Mineral nomenclature: New mineral names and redefinitions of existing names must be approved by the Commission on New Minerals Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC) of the International Mineralogical Association (IMA) (Fleischer 1970) before publication. For this purpose, consult the published reports of the Commission on New Minerals Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC) of the International Mineralogical Association (IMA). The MSA website hosts many of the IMA Reports.

  • A Special Note About Nomenclature: Remember it is the author’s responsibility to make sure the text, tables and other materials consistently follow the nomenclature recommended by the IMA. Reports detailing the CMNNC approved style for nomenclature for minerals and mineral groups are available.

New mineral names: Authors must provide the Editorial Office with evidence of IMA approval of any new mineral names. Whenever naming new minerals, authors must conform to the rules and principles set forth in Nickel and Mandarino (1987) (excerpt, pdf) or Nickel and Grice (1998) (pdf). The paper by the Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names (1982) should be consulted for a suggested outline for new mineral descriptions. The abstract of a new mineral description should completely list the properties of the mineral in a manner consistent with the “New Mineral Names” section of the journal. The paper by Nickel and Grice (1998) (pdf) gives more information on procedures. Additional information is given by Dunn (1977). Naming of regular interstratifications of clay minerals is discussed by Bailey (1982). In general, manuscripts proposing new names for imperfectly or incompletely described minerals cannot be accepted.

Obsolete, discredited, or superfluous mineral names may not be used. A helpful guide is Glossary of Mineral Species (Fleischer and Mandarino 1995). This glossary is taken as the standard for the spelling of mineral names. However, the editors now allow use of element symbols as prefixes to the approved name of a mineral (e.g., Mg-chlorite, K-feldspar). A list of discredited mineral names and examples of acceptable and unacceptable usages of mineral names appear in Nickel and Mandarino (1987) excerpt, pdf and Nickel and Grice (1998) (pdf).

Meteorite nomenclature: New meteorite names must be approved by the Nomenclature Committee of the Meteoritical Society [British Museum (Natural History), London, U.K.]. Other meteorite names must conform to the spelling given in the Catalogue of Meteorites (https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/metcat) or in subsequent numbers of the Meteoritical Bulletin (published in Meteoritics).

List of Necessary Items for Experimental Documentation

(Modified from Table 3.2.1 in the book Basalt Volcanism on Terrestrial Planets)

Most or all of the following can be placed into an electronic appendix, but must be made available to reviewers and the AE for review purposes.

      1. Goal of the experiments
      2. Documentation of starting materials—natural or synthetic—preparation procedures (oxide mix or gel, grinding methods, temperature, oxygen fugacity, etc. of preparation)—state (crystalline, glassy, gel)—mineralogy if crystalline—grain size and grain size distribution—composition after preparation and before use
      3. Experimental apparatus
      4. Thermocouple type, calibration and uncertainties
      5. Pressure measurement method, calibration and uncertainties
      6. Methods of temperature and pressure controlled
      7. Oxygen fugacity (controlled or uncontrolled, method of measurement and error)
      8. Method of addition of volatiles and uncertainty
      9. Sample container—material(s)—open or sealed capsule
      10. Pressure-temperature path during the experiments (heating and cooling rates and time at each temperature and pressure)
      11. Quenching method and rate to reach a specified temperature
      12. Special treatment, if any, during opening of the experimental capsule (e.g., freezing of a volatile phase)
      13. Evaluation of attainment of equilibrium for phase equilibrium experiments
      14. Demonstration of reproducibility and/or consistency for kinetic experiments
      15. Phase composition data in Excel or other spreadsheet format; could be made ready for incorporation into the database Library of Experimental Phase Relations (LEPR; http://lepr.ofm-research.org/; Hisrshmann et al. 2008, G3, vol. 9, DOI: 10.1029/2007GC001894).

Estimated Standard Deviation
Precision of measurement may be indicated as 1.781 ± 0.002, if 0.002 represents a subjective estimate of the measurement error. Where sufficient data permit calculation of the estimated standard deviation (e.s.d.), indicate it with parentheses e.g., 1.781(2) and 1.781(11) indicate an e.s.d. of 0.002 and 0.011, respectively. Only significant digits shall be given for the observed value, i.e., e.s.d. values in parentheses should be given as single or double digit integers. American Mineralogist as a policy requests that all measured values have to be accompanied by some indication on the uncertainty. Ideally this should be a properly calculated standard uncertainty. Only in exceptional cases, if scarcity of sample or some other special circumstances prohibit any even subjective estimation of an uncertainty, can this rule be waived.

Manuscript Submission/Peer Review Website

Ready to submit? Click here. Note that updating your contact info on this website does not “transfer” to the MSA membership database (contact the MSA Business Office to update your info).

As an author, you will be able to log in and monitor the progress of your paper. However, once you have approved your submission, you cannot delete it or substitute a new table, for example. If you need assistance, contact the Editorial office for help.

Timeframes for Am Min

A great number of variables can affect the flow of your manuscript through peer review. This information is provided for planning purposes and is not guaranteed. In general, an editor is assigned, and an associate editor (AE) is invited to handle the paper within a few days of submission. In about five to seven days, an AE will be found. The goal is for AEs to find reviewers within a couple of weeks, resulting in an overall review time of about six weeks. However, finding reviewers can be challenging. The factor the author has the most control over is the revision time. We remind you at 60 days and again at 120 days. If there is no communication, the manuscript is considered withdrawn after 120 days in revision. Resubmissions are encouraged when time allows. In general, once the revision is in, the AE may request further review, request another revision, discuss it, or make a recommendation to the editor. There is also a technical check for CIFs. If accepted, production takes about three months, depending on the existing inventory of accepted papers. These timelines should guide you on when to contact the associate editor or the editorial office for information about your paper, in a gentle manner, recognizing that all AEs and reviewers are volunteers.

Please go to our online submission site and submit over the web, where you will find complete instructions and help files.

Contact us with your questions here.

Nonnative English speakers

Authors for whom English is not a native language must have their manuscript reviewed by a colleague who is fluent in English before submitting it to American Mineralogist. Manuscripts that require extensive editing for grammar and spelling will be summarily rejected.

Manuscript Submission Checklist

Click to Download the Submission Checklist

 

Crystallographic Data (CIF) info for American Mineralogist

Updated Dec-15-2025

Introduction

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) is a standard format for communicating various types of crystallographic information. In particular, it is used to archive crystal structure data, combined with experimental and refinement details.

Manuscripts reporting results of crystal structure refinements must be accompanied by a CIF providing the structural data. To ensure the quality and integrity of the crystallographic data, the submitted CIF will be reviewed by one of the technical editors. After publication of the manuscript, the CIFs will be made available as supplementary material on the Am Min website and may also be deposited by the author into databases, such as the American Mineralogist Crystal Structure Database (AMCSD) and the Crystallography Open Database (COD).

Since a CIF contains atomic fractional coordinates and displacement parameters as well as sample measurement conditions, separate tables listing these parameters are generally unnecessary. Exceptions include brief tables of crystallographic parameters (such as selected bond lengths or bond valence sums) that are central to the discussion in the paper, especially if the tables help the reader understand comparisons across multiple structures.

Submission Guidelines

  1. Submit a single CIF with the manuscript, labelled “data set” on the submission site. If there are multiple structure refinements, they must be organized as distinct data blocks within the single file (e.g., data_I, data_II).
  2. Structure factors must be embedded in the CIF. If multiple structures are reported, ensure structure factors are included for every data block.
  3. If chemical analyses are reported in the manuscript, please add them to the CIF as the item:
    _chemical_formula_analytical ‘K0.96 Al0.96 Si1.04 O4’
  4. For natural samples, the following items must be inserted in the CIF:
    _chemical_name_mineral ‘IMA approved mineral name’
    _chemical_compound_source ‘locality and/or collection reference’
  5. For synthetic samples, the following item must be inserted in the CIF:
    _chemical_compound_source ‘synthesised at xx GPa and YY K’
  6. Data within the CIF must strictly correspond to the values presented in the manuscript’s text, tables, and figures.
  7. Upload the checkCIF report with your other materials, using the “related manuscript file” type.
  8. Resolve or justify any Level A or B alerts in the checkCIF report.
  9. Ensure the CIF is free of syntax errors.
  10. Tables reporting crystallographic data, which duplicate information present in CIF, must be removed from the main text or presented as a supplementary table.